1. This case study could be perceived as a copyright violation because of Section 106(4) of the Copyright Law of 1976. This section specifies that the owner of the copyright has exclusive right to publicly perform the work, which in this case was a literary work. The school did not seek or receive permission from the copyright holders to use the trademarked name of "Winnie the Pooh."
2. The pro for the school was a cute name for their radio program which encouraged students to read. However, the con was the risk of using a popular Disney character's name. The pro for the copyright holders was to make a profit off their Winnie the Pooh books and other products. The con associated with said pro was someone else making a profit off their property without legal permission.
3. From a business perspective, I do not detect a copyright violation. The Fair Use Doctrine, which is Section 107 of the Copyright Law, states that the copyrighted work could be used for teaching or scholarship. In this case study the use of Winnie the Pooh's name is not being used to make a financial profit, but rather for a student literature class to interest children in reading.
4.This case study already takes place from an educational perspective. I have already concluded that the use of Pooh's name has been covered by The Fair Use Doctrine, and therefore there is no copyright violation. The cease and desist letter was simply used as a scare tactic to intimidate the school.
5. Again, this case study makes me more thankful for the Fair Use Doctrine. As a teacher I know that I will want to use cute characters, like Winnie the Pooh, to get my students engaged, excited and interested in what we are learning! Using familiar characters and names is also a fantastic way to help students feel more comfortable and safe in my classroom. I am also a huge Disney fan, so if I am using it for educational purposes then I am not in dangerous territory as far as a copyright violation!
In fact, this was pre-Disney (an old example), so it was the AA Milne Foundation that wrote on behalf of Sears - who at that time was using the Pooh characters for marketing children's clothing. While I think you are right, the school stopped using the name on its school radio station.
ReplyDelete